Judicial Activism has nothing to do with striking down a law that was passed by Congress, as unconstitutional. Judicial Activism is when judges use things (their own social values, laws from other constitutions, etc.) that are outside the Constitution (that they swore to defend) to determine law in the United States.
You would think a former
While some on the Left are agreeing with him, most scholars are acknowledging a 'mistatement' or simply turn to Supreme Court decisions they disagree with...uh, what was the question?
I think he does not like the Constitution...well he wants to change it...fundamentally